素材や機能以外の発露

スケールと領域について考えているのは、素材と形、機能と形態という関係性とは別のところで建築を考えて、建築に素材や機能の要素を持ち込むことを極力少なくして、今までとは違った見え方をする建築ができる上がる可能性を高めるためである。

どうしても素材がまず思い浮かび、コンクリート打放しやスチールや木など、それで既視感が無い建築を考えるのもひとつの方法だが、どうしても必要される機能をまず考えてしまい、建築は人が使う物だから、人の使い方を機能であらかじめ設定するのもひとつの方法だが、素材と機能を建築の創作の発露にすること自体に可能性を感じられない。

スケールと領域の組合せでは各々明確な実体はなく、設定しだいで変化する曖昧さを持ち合わせていて、それが建築の輪郭や構造から細部形態まで決めることになれば、今までとは違った見え方で、少なくとも形は変わり、建築が立ち上がるかもしれない。

"Exposure other than materials and functions"

I'm thinking about scale and domain, thinking about architecture in a place other than the relationship between material and shape, function and form, and bringing materials and functional elements into architecture as little as possible. This is to increase the possibility of building a building that looks different.

One way is to think of an architecture that doesn't have a sense of déjà vu, such as exposed concrete, steel, or wood, because the material comes to mind first, but the functions that are absolutely necessary are first considered, and architecture is something that people use. One method is to preset how people use it with functions, but I don't feel the possibility of using materials and functions as a manifestation of architectural creation.

There is no clear substance in each combination of scale and area, and it has ambiguity that changes depending on the setting, and if it decides from the outline and structure of the architecture to the detailed form, it will look different from the past. So, at least the shape may change and the architecture may stand up.