可変の捉え直し

キャンピングカーは移動できるが狭い、だから「可変」が求められる。逆に建築は移動できないがキャンピングカー程は狭くなく広いので「可変」は必ずしも必要では無い。

建築では「可変」を標榜した時代もあったが、結局建築のスケールでは可変は容易ではなく、可変性を担保しながらそのまま何もしない状況になる。

建築における「可変」を捉え直してみようと思う。物理的な可変以外にも「可変」という概念や意識は持てるのではないかと考えている。

"Variable recapture"

Campers can move but are narrow, so "variable" is required. On the contrary, the building cannot be moved, but it is not as narrow and wide as a camper, so "variable" is not always necessary.

There was a time when architecture advocated "variable", but in the end it was not easy to change on the scale of architecture, and it became a situation where nothing was done as it was while ensuring variability.

I would like to reconsider the "variable" in architecture. I think that we can have the concept and consciousness of "variable" other than physical variable.