見方があるだけ

建築の存在は実体として捉えようとしても捉えられないのかと思った。建築はこういうものだとという見方があるだけで、たくさんの見方の重なりが濃いか薄いかだけの違いに思えてきた。見方には正解は無く、間違いは有るかもしれないが、どの見方を選択するかだけの違いかもしれない。だから、創作するのは建築という実体では無くて捉え方であり見方である。ただそのなると他律的に存在する建築はイメージしやすいが自律的に存在する建築がイメージしにくい。自律的な建築は捉え方や見方という外からの指標とは無縁だと考えてしまうので、純粋な自律的建築は存在しないように思える。

"There is only a point of view"

I wondered if the existence of architecture could not be grasped even if I tried to grasp it as an entity. There is only a view that architecture is like this, and it seems that the difference is whether the overlap of many views is strong or light. There is no correct answer in the view, and there may be mistakes, but it may only be the difference in which view you choose. Therefore, it is not the substance of architecture that is created, but the way of thinking and the way of looking at it. However, in that case, it is easy to imagine an architecture that exists heteronomously, but it is difficult to imagine an architecture that exists autonomously. It seems that there is no purely autonomous architecture, because we think that autonomous architecture has nothing to do with external indicators such as perspectives and perspectives.